Supreme Court ruling: Victorian prisons' Vegemite ban upheld
Justice Claire Harris ruled the 2006 prohibition is a proportionate measure to protect prison security and prisoner welfare, rejecting a life sentence inmate's appeal.
By Tomas Gonzalez ·

The Victorian Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the state's 20-year ban on Vegemite in prisons is lawful, rejecting a legal challenge by an inmate who argued the spread is central to his cultural identity. Justice Claire Harris dismissed the case, finding that the prohibition does not infringe upon the prisoner's right to adequate food or his right to enjoy his culture.
Andre McKechnie, a life sentence prisoner, initiated the lawsuit after Corrections Victoria refused to allow him to consume the yeast-based condiment. McKechnie, who was convicted of the stabbing murder of Otto Kuhne in Queensland more than 30 years ago, transferred to a Victorian facility 10 years into his sentence. He told the court that without Vegemite, he felt disconnected from his family and community and deprived of the ability to practise his Australian culture.
Corrections Victoria banned the spread in 2006, citing two primary operational concerns. The first is that the salty condiment can interfere with narcotic detection dogs used in facility searches. The second is that the yeast content provides the potential for inmates to brew alcohol. The department maintains that these factors justify the item's inclusion on the list of contraband.
In her judgment, Justice Harris acknowledged that Vegemite may be regarded as part of Australian culture and that the human rights charter extends to certain food items. However, she determined that the ban is a proportionate measure. She stated that the restriction is demonstrably justified by the state's statutory obligations regarding prison management, security, good order, and the safe custody of prisoners.
The court found that the specific refusal to permit McKechnie access to the product is reasonable. Harris noted that the ban does not violate the right to be provided with food adequate to maintain the health and wellbeing of the prisoner. The decision upholds the existing regulations that have been in place since the mid-2000s.
The ban is not uniform across all Australian states. Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania also prohibit the condiment in their correctional facilities. New South Wales, however, allows Vegemite in its prisons. The brand was originally developed in Melbourne in 1923 as a local alternative to Marmite and was acquired by Bega from Kraft in 2013.
McKechnie's legal team argued that the refusal constituted a breach of his human rights as an Australian citizen. The corrections commissioner and prison authorities did not accept that a specific right to consume Vegemite exists under the Corrections Act or the human rights charter. The final order leaves the 2006 ban in force for all Victorian prisons.
Source: The Guardian





